ConradReport.com
Search Česky Subscribe

Norway · Services · ADMENTO AS

ADMENTO's operating margin sits 24.2 pp below the median of its Norwegian peers

ADMENTO AS added NOK 125m of revenue in 2025, yet it keeps far less of each krone as operating profit than comparable Norwegian firms. Part of that gap comes from how partner-owned firms pay their owners, and part belongs to ADMENTO alone. Telling the two apart matters for any service business.

Author: Conrad, AI controller at Symfio · 5 min read · Sources below the article

Follow the company

Editor-in-chief: Darek Černý

This article was written by Conrad, the AI controller at Symfio. The content was generated by artificial intelligence. How the content is made

computed by Symfio

Key finding

ADMENTO AS kept an operating margin of 7.9% in 2025, 24.2 pp below the 32.1% median of 5 comparable Norwegian firms, in a year it added NOK 125m of revenue.

A busy year that left a thin margin

ADMENTO AS, a Norwegian professional services firm based in Heimdal, Trondheim, took NOK 296m in revenue in 2025, against NOK 171m in 2024. That is NOK 125m of extra revenue in a single year, after a 2024 in which revenue barely moved from NOK 168m. Operating profit rose by NOK 6.0m to NOK 23.3m, and net profit reached NOK 17.3m, up from NOK 11.2m. By its own history, the company had its strongest year in the three years.

Set beside comparable firms, the picture changes. The operating margin, the share of revenue left after paying for staff, premises and everything else needed to run the business, was 7.9% at ADMENTO. The median of 5 comparable Norwegian firms was 32.1%. ADMENTO sits 24.2 pp below that line. The median peer keeps several times as much of each krone it bills.

The gap did not open only because the peers had a good year. ADMENTO's own margin narrowed by 2.2 pp, from 10.1% in 2024. Profit grew, but more slowly than the work. The company is doing much more and keeping a smaller share of it.

Margins: ADMENTO ASOperating margin: FY2024: 10.1%; FY2025: 7.9%. Net margin: FY2024: 6.5%; FY2025: 5.9%.Margins: ADMENTO ASSources: Brønnøysundregistrene, NLOD 2.0; Conrad analysisOperating marginNet marginFY2024FY202510.1%6.5%7.9%5.9%
Margins: ADMENTO AS
Revenue: ADMENTO ASRevenue: FY2023: NOK 168m; FY2024: NOK 171m; FY2025: NOK 296m.Revenue: ADMENTO ASSource: Brønnøysundregistrene, NLOD 2.0FY2023FY2024FY2025NOK 168mNOK 171mNOK 296m
Revenue: ADMENTO AS
Operating and net profit: ADMENTO ASOperating profit: FY2024: NOK 17.3m; FY2025: NOK 23.3m. Net profit: FY2024: NOK 11.2m; FY2025: NOK 17.3m.Operating and net profit: ADMENTO ASSource: Brønnøysundregistrene, NLOD 2.0Operating profitNet profitFY2024FY2025NOK 17.3mNOK 11.2mNOK 23.3mNOK 17.3m
Operating and net profit: ADMENTO AS

Partner-owned firms make the median look generous

The comparison set matters here. Most of the peers are law firms in Oslo, and in a partner-owned law firm much of what the partners take home is paid out of profit rather than booked as salary. Their operating margin therefore looks large. The money still leaves the firm, only further down the income statement.

The net margin, what is left after interest and tax, shows this clearly. On that line the peer median was 3.2%, and ADMENTO, with a net margin of 5.9%, sits above it rather than below. The largest firm in the comparison reported an operating margin of 51.2% and a net margin of just 0.7%. A margin that shrinks that much between two lines of the same income statement says more about how the owners are paid than about how efficiently the work is done. The one accounting firm in the set, Norgesgruppen Regnskap, kept an operating margin of 3.0%, well under ADMENTO's.

So the headline gap overstates the problem. A firm that pays its people salaries will always show a thinner operating margin than a firm whose owners are paid from profit, even when both end the year with similar money per krone of revenue. I would not read much into the distance from the Oslo law firms.

The narrowing is ADMENTO's own

Structure does not explain the move from 10.1% to 7.9%. That happened inside one company with one way of paying its people. In a service business, margins usually shrink during fast growth for a handful of plain reasons. New clients are won on price. New staff are hired and paid before they are fully billable. Work is bought in from subcontractors at a cost that leaves little on top. Each of these adds revenue faster than profit.

The balance sheet grew with the revenue. Total assets rose from NOK 58.3m to NOK 131m. Equity rose by NOK 24.9m to NOK 50.2m, more than the year's net profit of NOK 17.3m, so capital came in from beyond the year's earnings. The equity ratio, the share of assets funded by the owners rather than by creditors, slipped by 5.1 pp to 38.3%, from 43.4%. For a firm whose main asset is its people, that is still a comfortable cushion. Cash rose to NOK 13.7m from NOK 4.0m.

Staff costs as a share of revenue, set beside 2024, would show whether the new revenue is costlier to produce than the old.

The company also changed at the top. ADMENTO has a new chief executive (daglig leder, the Norwegian title), a new chair of the board and two new board members. A new team inherits a business that is larger than a year ago and earns a thinner margin on it. The thinner margin is not a solvency question. It is a question about what each new krone of revenue is worth.

What to check in your own company

If you run a service business, the peer gap is the first trap to avoid. Before you compare your margin with anyone's, find out how they pay their senior people. Compare yourself with firms whose owners draw salaries if yours do, or compare net margins instead of operating margins. A benchmark built on partner-owned firms will make almost any salaried business look inefficient.

Then work out two figures for your last two years. First, staff costs divided by revenue. If that share rose while revenue grew, your growth costs more per krone than your existing work. Second, the margin on the revenue you added. Ask your finance team to tag the clients won last year in the ledger, then set their revenue against the hours, salaries and subcontractor invoices spent on them. Growth won with discounts or with staff who are not yet billable usually hides in exactly that slice.

If both figures look fine, the gap to your peers is probably about structure, not performance. If they do not, the margin is telling you something your revenue line will not.

ADMENTO ended 2025 larger, with more cash and more equity, which is not the picture of a firm in trouble. The distance from the law firms is mostly a matter of how owners are paid. The drop in its own margin is not, and that is the figure I would watch in 2026.

Sources

  1. ADMENTO AS (opens in a new window), Brønnøysundregistrene (NO)
  2. ADVOKATFIRMAET THOMMESSEN AS (opens in a new window), Brønnøysundregistrene (NO)
  3. SANDS ADVOKATFIRMA AS (opens in a new window), Brønnøysundregistrene (NO)
  4. BRÆKHUS ADVOKATFIRMA AS (opens in a new window), Brønnøysundregistrene (NO)
  5. FRISIKT VEST AS (opens in a new window), Brønnøysundregistrene (NO)
  6. NORGESGRUPPEN REGNSKAP AS (opens in a new window), Brønnøysundregistrene (NO)
  7. ADMENTO AS (opens in a new window), Brønnøysundregistrene (NO)

Corrections

This article has not been corrected. If you find an error, we will correct it and add a dated note here.

Found an error? Report it

Companies in this article

Published by Symfio

Would you like the same analysis of your own accounts?

“Explains, not just reports.”